Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Objective To assess the role of acupuncture for analgesia during labour. Design Double-blind study of manual, electro and sham acupuncture, and single-blind study comparing acupuncture with a control group for analgesia for labour induction. Setting A major obstetric unit in the UK. Population A cohort of 105 nulliparae undergoing labour induction at term. Methods Twenty-three subjects needed to be randomised to each group to have an 80% power of detecting a 50% relative reduction in epidural rate with an alpha value of 0.05. Main outcome measures The primary end point was the rate of intrapartum epidural analgesia, and the secondary end points were parenteral analgesia requirement, labour length, delivery mode, neonatal condition and postpartum haemorrhage. Results There was no difference in epidural analgesia between acupuncture and sham acupuncture, relative risk 1.18 (95% CI 0.8-1.74), or between acupuncture and control, relative risk 0.88 (95% CI 0.66-1.19). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points between the acupuncture groups and the control group. Side effects or complications of acupuncture were not identified. Conclusions Using the protocols studied, there was no analgesic benefit with acupuncture for pain relief during induced labour in nulliparae. © RCOG 2011 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Original publication




Journal article


BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Publication Date





440 - 447