Obesity is a chronic and complex disease affecting millions of people worldwide. Currently, there is no standard definition of success for the management of obesity. We set out to complete a synthesis of clinical practice guidelines for obesity management for adult populations, aiming to provide both a quantitative descriptive and qualitative analysis of definitions of success in clinical practice guidelines. An electronic search retrieved 4477 references. Sixteen clinical practice guidelines were included after screening and full-text review. We coded definitions of success 147 times across the included guidelines. No standard or explicit definition of success was identified in the guidelines but rather success was implicitly defined. We developed three themes describing how success was defined in the clinical practice guidelines: Knowledge-based decision making; management of expectations; and the perception of control. The review reinforced that success is an inherently subjective and complex concept. Defining success is limited by existing studies that focus on weight loss and would benefit from additional research on different outcomes. Equally, the relationship between people living with obesity and their clinicians should be further explored to understand how defining success is controlled, discussed and framed in a clinical setting.
\n \n\n \n \nBackground: Opportunistic recruitment in primary care is challenging due to the inherent unpredictability of incident conditions, and workload and time pressures. Many clinical trials do not recruit to target, leading to equivocal answers to research questions. Learning from the experiences of patients and recruiters to trials of incident conditions has the potential to improve recruitment and retention to future trials, thereby enhancing the quality and impact of research findings. The aim of this research was to learn from the trial experiences of UTI patients and recruiters to the Cranberry for UTI (CUTI) trial, to help plan an adequately powered trial of similar design. Methods: One-to-one semi-structured interviews were embedded within the CUTI feasibility trial, an open-label, randomised feasibility trial of cranberry extract for symptoms of acute, uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) in primary care. Interviews were conducted with a sample of: CUTI trial participants; non-CUTI trial UTI patients; and, recruiters to the CUTI trial. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically. Results: Twenty-six patients with UTI and eight recruiters (nurses and GPs) to the CUTI trial were interviewed. Three themes were developed around: reasons for participating in research; barriers to opportunistic recruitment; and, UTI patients\u2019 experiences of trial procedures. Recruiters found that targeted electronic prompts directed at healthcare practitioners based in clinics where patients with incident conditions were likely to present (e.g. minor illness clinic) were more effective than generic prompts (e.g. desk prompts) at filtering patients from their usual clinical pathway to research clinics. Using a script to explain the delayed antibiotic trial group to patients was found to be helpful, and may have served to boost recruitment. For UTI patients, using an electronic diary to rate their symptoms was considered an acceptable medium, and often preferable to using a paper diary or mobile phone application. Conclusions: The use of targeted prompts directed at clinicians, a script to explain trial groups that may be deemed less desirable, and an appropriate diary format for patient-reported outcomes, may help to improve trial recruitment and retention.
\n \n\n \n \nBackground: The need to increase exercise and decrease sedentary behaviour in people diagnosed with psychosis is well-recognised. Aims: We set out to explore caregivers\u2019 perspectives on what supports and prevents physical activity, and how to use carers\u2019 support most effectively. Method: Fourteen caregivers of people diagnosed with psychosis were interviewed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, in collaboration with caregivers. Results: Four themes were developed, the first flagging the importance of physical activity, then the others calling for action: (a) Physical inactivity matters: carers are keen to support efforts to increase physical activity in their family or friends because of the enormous impact physical inactivity has on patients, and consequently on carers themselves, such as social isolation and reduction in their own activity. (b) Tell us: without being well-informed about how to help, carers can feel like they are powerless to stop a \u2018slow suicide\u2019 or \u2018decline\u2019 in patients. (c) Listen to us: through knowing their family and friends well, carers are able to identify important changes in patients and identify successful motivators for them, but these insights can feel uninvited. (d) Ask us: being invited to support activity as a partner in a patients\u2019 care is desirable but having offers of help rejected can \u201cdemotivate the motivator.\u201d Conclusions: Caregivers described strong motivation to help patients to be more physically active but can feel that their support is overlooked and under-used by services. Clinical recommendations for carer involvement in physical activity interventions are offered.
\n \n\n \n \nIntroduction In June 2021, high-profile testimonials in the media about pain during intrauterine device (IUD) procedures in the UK prompted significant discussion across platforms including Twitter (subsequently renamed X). We examined a sample of Twitter postings (tweets) to gain insight into public perspectives and experiences. Methods We harvested tweets posted or retweeted on 21\u201322 June 2021 which contained the search terms coil, intrauterine system, IUD or intrauterine. We analysed the dataset thematically and selected illustrative tweets with the authors\u2019 consent for publication. Results Following deduplication and screening, we included 1431 tweets in our analysis. We identified testimonials with descriptions of varied pain experiences. Twitter users reported that clinicians had not warned them that pain could be severe or explained the options for pain relief. Some raised concerns about pain being minimised or dismissed and linked this to the management of women\u2019s pain in medicine more broadly. Twitter users described connecting to an online community with shared experiences as validating and used this as a springboard for collective action. Conclusions While we acknowledge the limitations of our sample, this study highlights important perspectives and accounts relating to pain during IUD procedures. Our findings attest to the need for strategies to improve the patient experience for those opting for IUD as a clinical priority. Further research should explore IUD users' experiences, expectations and wishes around pain management.
\n \n\n \n \nBackground: Antidiabetic medication is effective in preventing diabetes-related complications. However, 40% of type 2 diabetic patients do not adhere to their medication regimes adequately. Brief text messages represent a promising approach to support medication adherence. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of primary care professionals (PCPs) concerning the DiabeText intervention, a new text messaging intervention to be developed to support medication adherence in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Mallorca, Spain. Methods: We conducted four focus groups (n = 28) and eight semi-structured interviews with doctors and nurses. Data collection and analysis were carried out by researchers independently following Braun and Clark\u2019s methodology. Results: Three main themes were identified: (1) text messaging interventions have the potential to effectively support diabetes self-management; (2) involving PCPs in the intervention would facilitate its design and implementation; (3) obtaining evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness is a key prerequisite for large-scale implementation of the intervention. PCPs identified barriers and enablers of the design and implementation of the intervention and made suggestions about the content and format of the text messages. Conclusion: The DiabeText intervention is perceived as useful and acceptable by PCPs provided its cost-effectiveness.
\n \n\n \n \nBackground: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a long-term condition affecting around 10% of people worldwide. This study aimed to explore T2DM patients' views on DiabeText, a new text messaging intervention to be developed to support adherence to diabetes medication. Methods: A total of four focus groups were conducted with a purposive sample of people with T2DM (n = 34). The data were analysed by multiple researchers independently, and coded using thematic analysis. Results: There were two main themes that emerged: (1) \"patients' perspectives on unmet needs for diabetes self-management\", and (2) \"acceptability and perceived utility of DiabeText\". The patients identified a number of barriers for diabetes self-management, including lack of appropriate information and support with diet and physical activity. Support for medication-taking was not perceived as urgently needed, although several barriers were identified (eating outside, traveling, polymedication, dispensation at the pharmacy). The participants anticipated that the proposed intervention would present high levels of patient acceptability and perceived utility as long as its content addresses the barriers that were identified, and includes specific features (short and clear messages, and personalized information). Conclusion: The proposed intervention has the potential to be well accepted and perceived as useful by T2DM patients who require support not only in terms of medication-taking, but more prominently of lifestyle behaviour.
\n \n\n \n \nBACKGROUND: There is a significant mortality gap between the general population and people with psychosis. Completion rates of regular physical health assessments for cardiovascular risk in this group are suboptimal. Point-of-care testing (POCT) for diabetes and hyperlipidaemia - providing an immediate result from a finger-prick - could improve these rates. AIMS: To evaluate the impact on patient-clinician encounters and on physical health check completion rates of implementing POCT for cardiovascular risk markers in early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services in South East England. METHOD: A mixed-methods, real-world evaluation study was performed, with 40 POCT machines introduced across EIP teams in all eight mental health trusts in South East England from March to May 2021. Clinician training and support was provided. Numbers of completed physical health checks, HbA1c and lipid panel blood tests completed 6 and 12 months before and 6 months after introduction of POCT were collected for individual patients. Data were compared with those from the South West region, which acted as a control. Clinician questionnaires were administered at 2 and 8 months, capturing device usability and impacts on patient interactions. RESULTS: Post-POCT, South East England saw significant increases in HbA1c testing (odds ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.17-3.49), lipid testing (odds ratio 2.38, 95% CI 1.43-3.97) and total completed health checks (odds ratio 3.61, 95% CI 1.94-7.94). These increases were not seen in the South West. Questionnaires revealed improved patient engagement, clinician empowerment and patients' preference for POCT over traditional blood tests. CONCLUSIONS: POCT is associated with improvements in the completion and quality of physical health checks, and thus could be a tool to enhance holistic care for individuals with psychosis.
\n \n\n \n \nBackground Suicidal thoughts and behaviours are common in people in prison and associated with poor health outcomes, including suicide, injury and repeat self-harm. Objective To develop and validate a model to stratify risk of repeat suicidality up to 3 months in people in prison. Methods In seven English prisons, we identified 754 people aged over 17 who had been placed on a suicide risk management plan after a self-harm episode or elevated risk. We developed a multivariable model to stratify risk of repeat suicidality at 3 months using routinely collected sociodemographic, clinical and prison-related factors, which were tested using Cox proportional HR models. In a prospective validation sample of 390 people from 13 prisons, we tested this model to assess risk of repeat suicidality at 3 months across a range of performance measures. Findings Of the overall sample of 1144 people in prison (n=966 men or 84%, mean age 33 years), 22% had the outcome of repeat suicidality over 3 months. The final risk model consisted of nine factors, including sex, calendar age and features of recent suicidal behaviour. Calibration and discrimination were similar in both development and validation samples, with O:E ratio=1.09 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.35) and c-statistic=0.66 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.72) in external validation. At a 25% cut-off, sensitivity was 58% (50 to 66) and specificity was 72% (68 to 75) in external validation. The tool (Risk Assessment for people in Prison at risk of Self-harm and Suicide, RAPSS) is available as an online risk calculator at https://oxrisk.com/rapsstrial/. Interpretation A novel assessment approach for repeat suicidality can provide an evidence-based approach to stratify risk and better allocate resources.
\n \n\n \n \nObjective In late 2022, Western Europe and the United States experienced increased incidences of scarlet fever and life-threatening invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) infections, especially among children. The outbreak was widely reported in the media in the United Kingdom, leading to increased emergency department (ED) attendances and threatened supplies of antibiotics. Our ED rapidly introduced point-of-care testing for GAS pharyngitis with the aim of rationalizing antibiotic prescribing. Methods We rapidly implemented the use of a molecular-based (polymerase chain reaction) point-of-care test for all children scoring 3 or higher on the McIsaac clinical prediction rule for GAS pharyngitis in children and performed a nested diagnostic accuracy study. The main outcome was concordance or discordance of antibiotic prescribing with the test result. Results Between December 2022 and April 2023, a total of 1,388 patients underwent point-of-care test (45% female, 55% male, median age of 3 y). Based on medical records review, 571 (41%) patients were tested inappropriately (i.e., they did not have documented pharyngitis or similar infection). Antibiotic prescribing was largely appropriate for patients with a diagnosis of pharyngitis or similar presentation, with 20.47% of children with a negative test prescribed antibiotics. Conclusion Antibiotic concordance was acceptable for children with pharyngitis and similar presentations, but nearly half of children without acute respiratory symptoms were tested inappropriately. EDs considering rapid implementation of point-of-care test in similar circumstances should ensure clear guidelines and training around their use so that clinically useful tests are not inadvertently dropped and resources are not wasted.
\n \n\n \n \nBackground There is considerable interest in technology-enabled remote monitoring in the UK. The aim is to respond to system pressures and improve access, experience and quality of care. There is an urgent need for process, outcome and impact evaluations of interventions at various stages of development and implementation to address evidence gaps around adoption, spread, sustainability and inequalities. Aim DECIDE (Digitally Enabled Care in Diverse Environments) is a centre for rapid evaluation of technology-enabled remote monitoring funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (2023 to 2026). It aims to support service users, service commissioners and providers of remote monitoring services, to enable high quality care. Example questions include: Is the technology-enabled remote monitoring innovation needed and, if so, for whom? How are technology-enabled care pathways implemented, and what are associated outcomes and impacts? What are the opportunities and challenges for sustainability, scale-up and spread? Methods A range of qualitative, quantitative and economic methods will be used. Exact methods and questions will be dependent on the focus, scope and scale of each evaluation. Evaluations will be informed by relevant theory, including the Non-Adoption, Abandonment and the challenges to Spread, Scale-up and Sustainability of technological innovation in health and care (NASSS) framework. A User Advisory Group and External Steering Committee, both with diverse voices, will help shape evaluation design, implementation and dissemination. Project-led dissemination will ensure timely sharing of insights and support impact. Conclusion Evaluations will advance understanding of when and for whom technology-enabled remote monitoring innovation is needed; how it works and how factors related to the intervention, implementation process and wider context influence adoption; associated outcomes and impacts, whether and how these tackle inequalities; and potential challenges to scale and spread. We aim to inform decision-making by policymakers, commissioners, providers, patients/service users and researchers.
\n \n\n \n \nBackground: Evidence for the effect of favipiravir treatment of acute COVID-19 on recovery, hospital admissions and longer-term outcomes in community settings is limited. Methods: In this multicentre. open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomised controlled trial participants aged \u226518 years in the community with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 and symptoms lasting \u226414 days were randomised to: usual care; usual care plus favipiravir tablets (loading dose of 3600 mg in divided doses on day one, then 800 mg twice a day for four days); or, usual care plus other interventions. Co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery and hospitalisation/death related to COVID-19, within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. Recovery at six months was the primary longer-term outcome. Trial registration: ISRCTN86534580. Findings: The primary analysis model included 8811 SARS-CoV-2 positive mostly COVID vaccinated participants, randomised to favipiravir (n = 1829), usual care (n = 3256), and other treatments (n = 3726). Time to self-reported recovery was shorter in the favipiravir group than usual care (estimated hazard ratio 1\u00b723 [95% credible interval 1\u00b714 to 1\u00b733]), a reduction of 2\u00b798 days [1\u00b799 to 3\u00b794] from 16 days in median time to self-reported recovery for favipiravir versus usual care alone. COVID-19 related hospitalisations/deaths were similar (estimated odds ratio 0\u00b799 [0\u00b761 to 1\u00b761]; estimated difference 0% [\u22120\u00b79% to 0\u00b76%]). 14 serious adverse events occurred in the favipiravir group and 4 in usual care. By six months, the proportion feeling fully recovered was 74\u00b79% for favipiravir versus 71\u00b73% for usual care (RR = 1\u00b705, [1\u00b702 to 1\u00b708]). Interpretation: In this open-label trial in a largely vaccinated population with COVID-19 in the community, favipiravir did not reduce hospital admissions, but shortened time to recovery and had a marginal positive impact on long term outcomes.
\n \n\n \n \nVarious open science practices have been proposed to improve the reproducibility and replicability of scientific research, but not for all practices, there may be evidence they are indeed effective. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of the literature on interventions to improve reproducibility. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus and Eric, on 18 August 2023. Any study empirically evaluating the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving the reproducibility or replicability of scientific methods and findings was included. We summarized the retrieved evidence narratively and in evidence gap maps. Of the 105 distinct studies we included, 15 directly measured the effect of an intervention on reproducibility or replicability, while the remainder addressed a proxy outcome that might be expected to increase reproducibility or replicability, such as data sharing, methods transparency or pre-registration. Thirty studies were non-comparative and 27 were comparative but cross-sectional observational designs, precluding any causal inference. Despite studies investigating a range of interventions and addressing various outcomes, our findings indicate that in general the evidence base for which various interventions to improve reproducibility of research remains remarkably limited in many respects.
\n \n\n \n \nReport from a workshop organised by the British Society of Genetic Medicine and the Centre for Personalised Medicine
\n \n\n \n \n